|
Technical: Digital Conversion Methodology
Image Creation
All of the images from the Centennial Exhibition
Digital Collection (CEDC) were scanned at the Free Library of Philadelphia
(FLP) Digitization Center. The Library purchased two Agfa Duoscan
T2000 XL flatbed scanners that allow reflective scanning of images
up to 12x18 inches, and transparent media scanning up to 9 1/2 x12
inches. For photographs with significant bowing, or that were too
large for the flatbed scanner, a contract photographer created high-quality
4x5 inch color transparencies, which were then scanned. In addition,
a selection of approximately fifty lithographs, fifty trade cards
and some related materials were scanned.
Resolution and file formats for access files and thumbnails were
selected to facilitate speed of transfer via the Internet and to
minimize the requirement for high-speed CPUs and a large amount
of memory on the end user computers. All master files were saved
as uncompressed TIFF files with appropriate header data, adapted
from the Library of Congress TIFF header tag requirements.
During the first quarter of the project, the project director and
scanning technician prepared a complete shooting script for all
the material in the project. Each item in the script was assigned
a unique seven-digit number that was incorporated into the file
name and used to retrieve the images from the web server. CEDC items
have been batched in nineteen different categories. Photographs
made by the Centennial Photographic Company are batched by size
(7 categories). Additional categories include photographs by other
photographers (3 categories), lithographs, engravings, manuscripts
(2 categories), sheet music, trade cards, a two-volume scrapbook,
maps, and realia.
A prescanning form was developed by the project director for each
category in the CEDC for entering basic descriptive and administrative
metadata for each item. This metadata was then entered into a MS
Access database upon scanning. Technical metadata was embedded in
the TIFF header during digitization. Batched forms were transferred
to the catalogers after the access and thumbnail jpeg's had been
saved to the server.
Quality Control
Prior to the start of scanning the photographs, a rigorous benchmarking
process was instituted to ensure that adequate detail was captured
in the digital master files saved to CD-ROM in TIFF format. As a
result of the benchmarking process, all photographic material with
a size less than 8x10 inches (560 items) were scanned at 600 ppi
with a bit depth set to 8 per color channel. Photographs 8x10 inches
or larger were scanned at 400 ppi with a bit depth set to 8 per
color channel (721 items). If the larger photographs were scanned
at 600 ppi, the scanning time would have been more than 10 minutes
for 17x21 inch photographs generating master files as large as 160
MB. This was deemed unacceptable. This would not have been the case
if the originals were being scanned in 8-bit grayscale. However
the decision was made early in the project to create digital files
that most closely capture the current sepia tonal range of the photographs
based on current as well as projected uses of the collection.
The digital files for web viewing were created from the master
TIFF in Adobe PhotoShop at 72-dpi 24-bit color and saved as jpeg
files using high compression. The reference jpeg files are scaled
to 7.5 inches along the longest dimension. The thumbnail files are
scaled to 2 inches along the longest dimension. A curve was applied
in PhotoShop to slightly darken the images for viewing purposes,
adding contrast and increasing the blue channel.
To maintain quality assurance during digitization, each scanner
was calibrated twice a month and each monitor, twice a day. Quality
control for the first thirty scans consisted of checking each master
TIFF displayed on one of the monitors in the digitization lab against
the original photograph. After the first thirty scans, every 10th
scan was checked against the original. All scanned files were opened
to ensure full functionality. The reference jpegs and thumbnails
were spot checked on various workstations and opened in different
browsers and evaluated for appearance.
|